English
Deutsch
Русский
Español
Portugues
Italiano
Français
简体中文
正體中文
日本語
한국어
English
Comercio
Vacaciones de Verano| Fecha | Jugador | Message |
|---|---|---|
| Hoy 00:40 | Bro i want to beat 100k+ just to end this nightmare anymore, then i can feel free to focus on boardigami, farming beg wins (and hunting 6's 7's and 8's) and also equipment | |
| Hoy 00:39 | Yey | |
| Hoy 00:39 | Yes gg's | |
| Hoy 00:39 | gg | |
| Hoy 00:37 | No ggs? | |
| Hoy 00:36 | so basically there could be 1 or 2 mines in that 2x2? does this mean that I should assume its a 1 mine solution and click the top right of the 2x2? | |
| Hoy 00:32 | Ugh. peudo=pseudo, of course, for anyone using a translator | |
| Hoy 00:30 | The pseudo is at the bottom left. Do you see where to click? | |
| Hoy 00:30 | Pb I want: 40.961
Pb I get: /new-game?g=6488879066 | |
| Hoy 00:30 | Here's the example I have on my profile. /screen/2722235349-hd-22-103700.png | |
| Hoy 00:30 | /new-game?g=6488845533 bro this stupid logic box 50/50 | |
| Hoy 00:29 | So if you win, yay and if you lose, then you saved yourself some time | |
| Hoy 00:29 | /player/48428636 Yeah, we call those peudo-50/50. Even if it's in the middle of a game, often there's a spot that's either a 50/50 or solvable so you just assume it's the solvable one and click it. If you lose, then it was a 50/50 and you would have had to guess eventually. | |
| Hoy 00:28 | i am struggling a lot with efficiency, is there any method to actually practice it other than the guide. seems like i cant manage high efficiency with huge openings | |
| Hoy 00:27 | i would have never spotted that one of those broke the 50/50, ig i have a lot more to learn | |
| Hoy 00:25 | yw | |
| Hoy 00:25 | So even though they were both 67% safe, mine was 67% chance to win and yours was 33%. That's the difference between safety and progress chance. | |
| Hoy 00:25 | i see! ty! | |
| Hoy 00:25 | https://imgur.com/b1OBqOb but if yours was safe, you still have a 50/50 | |
| Hoy 00:24 | Which means the top right is only 1/3 chance to be a mine | |
| Hoy 00:24 | It's the same reason. The 3 on the bottom wall needs 2 more mines so the top left of the 2x2 block is 2/3 chance to be a mine | |
| Hoy 00:24 | wait didnt you also suggest top right? | |
| Hoy 00:23 | ||
| Hoy 00:23 | i understood why the guess i made was safe, but i don't understand the other 33% one | |
| Hoy 00:23 | ohh | |
| Hoy 00:22 | The guess I suggested was just as safe but broke the 50/50 and would have solved it | |
| Hoy 00:22 | So the guess you make was a safe guess, but it would have forced a 50/50 | |
| Hoy 00:22 | top right was best guess only 33% mine | |
| Hoy 00:21 | Maybe... there is something safe idk | |
| Hoy 00:21 | In this case, the best thing to do is just enumerate all the possible ways to arrange the mines. But that 2x2 bit could be a 50/50 or the left two are both mines. | |
| Hoy 00:21 | It's Basian probabilities at this point | |
| Hoy 00:21 | /arena?7679238 damn, would've been first if I started arena right on the hour. even then, my touchpad was having some problems in the first 3–4 games :/ | |
| Hoy 00:20 | Those are not independent events. | |
| Hoy 00:20 | /new-game?g=6488848118 40 mastery...finally...it was a **** pain | |
| Hoy 00:20 | ||
| Hoy 00:20 | is there logic in guessing that higher numbers are rarer and there i should try to minimize the numbers | |
| Hoy 00:20 | But the 2x2 square is a pseudo 50/50 so the top right cell is the best guess. 67% chance to solve, I think | |
| Hoy 00:19 | It could be safe, but it's 66% mine, right? | |
| Hoy 00:19 | /player/48848937 no? | |
| Hoy 00:19 | I wish you would do something about the PvP lag. It’s not right to lose without even being able to play. | |
| Hoy 00:19 | Other 3 mines are maybe all 50/50's | |
| Hoy 00:19 | /player/48428636 mine is on right of that bottom 3 | |
| Hoy 00:18 | /player/48428636 No, but there are better and worse places to guess | |
| Hoy 00:18 | /new-game?g=6488837144 is there a way to solve this? | |
| Hoy 00:17 | Are you on pace to finish? | |
| Hoy 00:17 | No reason to do it halfway. | |
| Hoy 00:17 | /player/20392890 I mean yeah if I were to eff might as well go full eff. | |
| Hoy 00:16 | I have a telescope sitting around. Just has a broken tripod (the way I got it). Not stable, can easily collapse. | |
| Hoy 00:12 | Ngl playing eff on nightmare is craziest thing humanity can ever think of XD | |
| Hoy 00:12 | He is obsessed with topaz shaped jades | |
| Hoy 00:12 | Yeah, it's intense | |
| Hoy 00:11 | Omg bro really has more than 100% efficiency in any game I checked | |
| Hoy 00:10 | Haha. Yeah, that's a lot of jades. | |
| Hoy 00:10 | I can hit 120 something on a decent amount of them, which does pays. | |
| Hoy 00:09 | Doing eff on L8E nightmare has the feeling of stealing more value out of the ticket, which I like. | |
| Hoy 00:09 | /player/20392890 You can see the games he's played so far here: /arena?7664186 | |
| Hoy 00:08 | For street cred | |
| Hoy 00:08 | He's doing it for efficiency | |
| Hoy 00:07 | Why are you doing L8E nightmare lol | |
| Hoy 00:02 | Mfw can't do any of that cuz L8E nightmare: | |
| Hoy 00:02 | Yes, but use a L4 to do a L2 quest is a wasting | |
| Hoy 00:01 | /player/8679391 Arena finally! | |
| Hoy 00:01 | :((( | |
| Hoy 00:00 | Back then they were lots of myths about sun getting eaten, yes. | |
| Hoy 00:00 | Yeah, you can't see it with the naked eye, but when it flares up you can. Not enough to notice unless you know where to look though. It doesn't get all that bright. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:59 | /player/2853300 I’ll look at the star later. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:59 | /player/3733293 Well, if the moon drifted closer, we'd just have longer totalities. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:59 | For the people back then, at least you could see what was happening with a solar eclipse. Lunar eclipses would probably be more trippy. Although I guess there would be fear that the sun had been eaten. Imagine the excitement when it reappeared | |
| 27 de agosto 23:58 | Cuz later than that things drift out of those exact perfect ratios so solar eclipse can't be truly Total anymore. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:58 | Go back a bit in history (or prehistory) for extra fun, or what was usual then. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:58 | We'll just make a bigger one. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:57 | Yeah, moon's gonna be too far away a few thousand years from now or something. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:57 | I find it interesting that the sun and moon have the same apparent size from here (with small variations). Eclipses could’ve easily all been annular, or prolonged total eclipses could’ve been common. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:57 | There's actually a very finite amount of time left where a real total solar eclipse can still be A Thing. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:57 | /player/19954262 Nah. I used the wrong term. I just meant T Coronae Borealis. It's supposed to have a giant flare-up sometime in the next couple of years, but not supernova | |
| 27 de agosto 23:56 | Lunar eclipse is boring compare to solar eclipse tbh | |
| 27 de agosto 23:56 | /player/2853300 Total solar eclipse only happens cuz of both a cosmic alignment and the ratios between the distances being Just Right. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:56 | Betelgeuse keeps hitting the news in certain circles. Is it going for real this time? | |
| 27 de agosto 23:56 | *old | |
| 27 de agosto 23:55 | /player/7324062 nice | |
| 27 de agosto 23:55 | Still waiting for that one star to go supernova | |
| 27 de agosto 23:55 | I still think they're pretty great, but I suppose I'm relatively ol. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:55 | dang i found two 8's in two days | |
| 27 de agosto 23:55 | Supernormal stimuli all the way. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:54 | Haha. I guess. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:54 | It did make me think. People seemed unimpressed by the 90% eclipse. Is that why we came to watch? It’s cool and unusual enough. I don’t think we’re programmed anymore to accept anything that isn’t engineered to hit pleasure centers. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:54 | And an asteroid strike has pretty significant proportions but is also quite quick | |
| 27 de agosto 23:53 | I think it's a bit of a stretch to say an eclipse has cosmic proportions though. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:53 | Anyways, gotta go | |
| 27 de agosto 23:52 | I mean given my experience (13-18 yrs and haven't ever seen one) this is definitely worth it | |
| 27 de agosto 23:52 | Usually events of cosmic proportions are unimaginably SLOW. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:52 | It is very cool that an eclipse is simultaneously an event of cosmic proportions and something extremely transient and fleeing even on a timescale of us mortals. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:51 | Actual totality makes the biggest difference. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:51 | I don't think so. I think there's a huge difference between 99 and 100 | |
| 27 de agosto 23:50 | There is a REALLY big difference between 94% solar and 99%, right? | |
| 27 de agosto 23:50 | Yeah, with lunar 93% and total are pretty similar, but with solar it's like a completely different event | |
| 27 de agosto 23:50 | Peak is apparently after 4 UTC which is 6 CEST. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:49 | I had 90% solar. Enough to be eerie but still far from what I hear total ones are like. | |
| 27 de agosto 23:49 | /player/19954262 it peaks at like 4 am in your area right? | |
| 27 de agosto 23:49 | Yeah, lunar eclipses are kinda fun but nothing like a total solar |
